Stop Reviewing Documents. Start Building Cases.

CLUE turns complaints, productions, records, correspondence, transcripts, and other evidence into a structured case.

See the claims. See the elements. See what supports them. See what refutes them. See what is missing.

Then put your lawyers to work on the decisions that matter.

Processing, hosting, eDiscovery access, evidence construction, and litigation intelligence operate as one service.

An eight-lawyer firm that hires a ninth lawyer increases attorney headcount by 12.5%.

CLUE is designed to increase the productive capacity of the entire litigation team.

Instead of adding people simply to absorb discovery, give the lawyers you already have control over more cases and more evidence.

Capacity without proportional headcount.

Complaint + productions + records

↓

Claims → elements → evidence → source

↓

Timeline · witnesses · damages · gaps · contradictions

↓

Discovery · depositions · experts · motions · settlement · trial

Material conclusions stay tied to the underlying source evidence. The attorney can move from a proposition back to the documents, passages, or records supporting or refuting it.

Case intelligence — claims and elements, supporting evidence, refuting evidence, gaps, chronology, witnesses, damages, communications, contradictions, key documents.

Transcripts — depositions, hearings, and trial testimony processed into source-grounded testimony, every answer bound to its page and line and indexed against the claims and elements it bears on. Summaries come back witness by witness and issue by issue, with the citation attached to each proposition, so a summary can be checked against the record rather than taken on trust.

Litigation work product — pleading analysis, discovery, deposition preparation, expert preparation, motion support, settlement analysis, trial preparation.

CLUE does not replace attorney judgment. It changes where attorney judgment begins.

Add case capacity before payroll. More cases ordinarily require more lawyers, more reviewers, more vendors, more hosting, more experts, more capital. CLUE changes that relationship to: more cases, predictable matter cost, greater attorney leverage.

Make discovery cost predictable. Traditional discovery costs rise with data volume — processing, hosting, review, contract lawyers, litigation support. Processing, hosting, and eDiscovery access are included in the matter-based service. A document dump should not become a capital event.

Reduce capacity-driven joint ventures. Partner for strategy, not review capacity.

Lower expert orientation expense. Use experts for expertise.

Carry more qualified cases. A contingency firm is a portfolio of cases, and every matter competes for attorney capacity and litigation capital. The question changes from can we afford to handle this case? to is this a case worth owning?

Joint ventures can add enormous value.

But a plaintiff firm should not have to give away case economics solely because it cannot afford the people or infrastructure required to absorb a production.

CLUE gives the originating firm more ability to carry the evidentiary burden itself. That means partners can be chosen for expertise, trial capability, relationships, capital, or strategy — rather than simply for review capacity.

Preserve control. Preserve leverage. Preserve more of the economics when the case warrants it.

Do not hand an $800-per-hour expert 600,000 documents and pay them to discover the case.

CLUE organizes the relevant evidence around the claims and issues before expert analysis begins. Give the expert the chronology, the disputed facts, the supporting evidence, the contradictory evidence, and the sources.

Then pay for what only the expert can provide:

judgment, methodology, opinion, and testimony.

For each claim and element, CLUE can surface supporting evidence, refuting evidence, contradictions, missing evidence, relevant witnesses, important chronology, and the underlying source.

That intelligence can drive discovery, depositions, expert work, motions, settlement, and trial preparation.

$30,000 per month for the first two active matters. $10,000 per additional active matter per month. Processing included. Hosting included. eDiscovery access included. No seat fees.

Active matters	Monthly cost	Average cost per matter
2	$30,000	$15,000
3	$40,000	$13,333
4	$50,000	$12,500
5	$60,000	$12,000
10	$110,000	$11,000

The number of people involved in a case should not determine the cost of the litigation platform. Involve partners, associates, paralegals, litigation support, experts, consultants, and appropriate co-counsel without creating another charge every time the team grows.

Cost follows matters — not people. The commercial point is not simply that the price is fixed. It is that the firm can know the infrastructure cost of an additional case before taking it.

Turn discovery from an unknown capital exposure into a forecastable operating expense.

Start with the case — not the review queue.